Archive for September 7, 2011

EYE-BALL on – The Australian Parliamentary Process – Part II – Monetary Policy arrangements between the Government and the Reserve Bank

September 7, 2011 Comments off
The Australian Parliamentary Process – Part II –
Monetary Policy arrangements between the Government and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) …
The Governor of the RBA today made a speech to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Western Australia) and the Chamber of Minerals and Energy (Western Australia) during a Corporate Breakfast. In this address he highlighted current market conditions and their impact on the Australian Economy. The full text of the speech can be read using this link:  The story within this story is about the relationship between the Government and the RBA.

Mr Stevens made reference to the formalised policy that has existed between the Government and the RBA since 1990. He even provided the link to where this policy is documented and it is to this policy and the arrangements contained within that this post wants to debate hereto.

A statement by the Treasurer and the RBA Governor given in Sept 2010 on the existing policy arrangements between both parties is reproduced below – and can be read online using this link.

RBAGovernment Crown

Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy – The Treasurer and the Governor of the Reserve Bank

30 September 2010

This statement records the common understanding of the Governor, as Chairman of the Reserve Bank Board, and the Government on key aspects of Australia’s monetary and central banking policy framework.

Since the early 1990s, inflation targeting has formed the basis of Australia’s monetary policy framework. Since 1996, this framework has been formalised in a Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy. The inflation targeting framework has served Australia well and is reaffirmed in the current statement.

This statement should continue to foster a better understanding, both in Australia and overseas, of the nature of the relationship between the Reserve Bank and the Government, the objectives of monetary policy, the mechanisms for ensuring transparency and accountability in the way policy is conducted, and the independence of the Reserve Bank.

This statement also records our common understanding of the Reserve Bank’s longstanding responsibility for financial system stability.

Relationship between the Reserve Bank and the Government

The Reserve Bank Act 1959 (the Act) gives the Reserve Bank Board the power to determine the Reserve Bank’s monetary policy and take the necessary action to implement policy changes. The Act nominates the Governor as Chairman of the Reserve Bank Board.

The Government recognises the independence of the Reserve Bank and its responsibility for monetary policy matters and will continue to respect the Reserve Bank’s independence as provided by statute.

New appointments to the Reserve Bank Board will be made by the Treasurer from a register of eminent candidates of the highest integrity maintained by the Secretary to the Treasury and the Governor. This procedure removes the potential for political considerations in the appointment process and ensures only the best qualified candidates are appointed to the Reserve Bank Board.

Section 11 of the Act prescribes procedures for the resolution of policy differences between the Reserve Bank Board and the Government. The procedures, in effect, allow the Government to determine policy in the event of a material difference; but the procedures are politically demanding and their nature reinforces the Reserve Bank’s independence in the conduct of monetary policy. Safeguards like this ensure that monetary policy is subject to the checks and balances inherent and necessary in a democratic system.

In addressing the Reserve Bank’s responsibility for monetary policy, the Act provides that the Reserve Bank Board shall, from time to time, inform the Government of the Reserve Bank’s policy. Such arrangements are a common and valuable feature of institutional systems in other countries with independent central banks and recognise the importance of macroeconomic policy co-ordination.

Consistent with its responsibilities for economic policy as a whole, the Government reserves the right to comment on monetary policy from time to time.

Objectives of Monetary Policy

The goals of monetary policy are set out in the Act, which requires the Reserve Bank Board to conduct monetary policy in a way that, in the Reserve Bank Board’s opinion, will best contribute to:

  • the stability of the currency of Australia;
  • the maintenance of full employment in Australia; and
  • the economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia.

The first two objectives lead to the third, and ultimate, objective of monetary policy and indeed of economic policy as a whole. These objectives allow the Reserve Bank Board to focus on price (currency) stability while taking account of the implications of monetary policy for activity and, therefore, employment in the short term. Price stability is a crucial precondition for sustained growth in economic activity and employment.

Both the Reserve Bank and the Government agree on the importance of low inflation and low inflation expectations. These assist businesses in making sound investment decisions, underpin the creation of jobs, protect the savings of Australians and preserve the value of the currency.

In pursuing the goal of medium-term price stability, both the Reserve Bank and the Government agree on the objective of keeping consumer price inflation between 2 and 3 per cent, on average, over the cycle. This formulation allows for the natural short-run variation in inflation over the cycle while preserving a clearly identifiable performance benchmark over time.

Since the adoption of inflation targeting in the early 1990s, inflation has averaged around the midpoint of the inflation target band. The Governor takes this opportunity to express his continuing commitment to the inflation objective, consistent with his duties under the Act. For its part the Government indicates that it endorses the inflation objective and emphasises the role that disciplined fiscal policy must play in achieving such an outcome.

Transparency and Accountability

Monetary policy needs to be conducted in an open and forward-looking way. A forward-looking focus is essential as policy adjustments affect activity and inflation with a lag and because of the crucial role of inflation expectations in shaping actual inflation outcomes. In addition, with a clearly defined inflation objective, it is important that the Reserve Bank continues to report on how it sees developments in the economy, currently and in prospect, affecting expected inflation outcomes. These considerations point to the need for effective transparency and accountability arrangements.

The Reserve Bank takes a number of steps to ensure the conduct of monetary policy is transparent. The Governor issues a statement immediately after each meeting of the Board, announcing and explaining the Board’s monetary policy decision, and minutes of each meeting are issued two weeks later providing background to the Board’s deliberations. The Reserve Bank’s public commentary on the economic outlook and issues bearing on monetary policy settings, through public addresses and its quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy and Bulletin, have been crucial in promoting increased understanding of the conduct of monetary policy. The Reserve Bank will continue to promote public understanding in this way.

The Governor has also indicated that he plans to continue the practice of making himself available to report on the conduct of monetary policy twice a year to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics.

The Treasurer expresses support for the continuation of these arrangements, through which the transparency and accountability of the Reserve Bank’s conduct of monetary policy are in line with international best practice. These arrangements enhance the public’s confidence in the independence and integrity of the monetary policy process.
Financial Stability

The stability of the financial system is critical to a stable macroeconomic environment. Financial stability is a longstanding responsibility of the Reserve Bank and its Board, and was reconfirmed at the time of significant changes made to Australia’s financial regulatory structure in July 1998. These changes included the transfer of responsibility for the supervision of banks to a new integrated regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), and the establishment of the Payments System Board within the Reserve Bank.

The Reserve Bank Board oversees the Bank’s work on financial system stability. Without compromising the price stability objective, the Reserve Bank seeks to use its powers where appropriate to promote the stability of the Australian financial system. It does this in several ways, including through its central position in the financial system and its role in managing and providing liquidity to the system, and through its chairmanship of the Council of Financial Regulators, comprising the Reserve Bank, APRA, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and Treasury. In addition, the Payments System Board has explicit regulatory authority for payments system stability. In fulfilling these obligations, the Reserve Bank will continue to publish its analysis of financial stability matters through its half-yearly Financial Stability Review and will be available to report as appropriate to relevant Parliamentary committees.

The Reserve Bank’s mandate to uphold financial stability does not equate to a guarantee of solvency for financial institutions, and the Bank does not see its balance sheet as being available to support insolvent institutions. However, the Reserve Bank’s central position in the financial system, and its position as the ultimate provider of liquidity to the system, gives it a key role in financial crisis management. In fulfilling this role, the Reserve Bank will continue to co-ordinate closely with the Government and with the other Council agencies.

The Treasurer expresses support for these arrangements, which served Australia well during the recent international crisis period.

The summation comment from above highlights the ignorance – and non-acknowledgement at the cost the high value of the A$ has caused …

‘Served Australia well’ – this statement is also a false perception – Australia’s relative high interest rates compared with the US and Europe – has placed extreme pressure on Australia’s home mortgage sector – cracks are appearing with arrears and delinquencies rising to levels that have Banks concerned – and about what might happen if the property market bubble really burst here as it did in the US and across Europe.


Using the A$vUS$ chart above – the rise in the A$ does not reflect the policy of a stable currency – in fact the A$ currency has become the play thing of global investors and the wealth they are stripping from Australia runs into the A$100’s billions  Neither the Government or the RBA have visibly stepped into the markets to try and stop the rise of the A$vUS$.

Exceptions can be made for the GFC correction – however since early 2009 – the value of the A$ has appreciated some 80% off the A$.60c lows – and 60% above the ‘mean average’ since when the currency was first floated in 1983. [see chart above]

This does not represent currency stability.

The Treasurer Mr Swan spoke on the release of the National Account figures today and gave his assessment of how the Australian economy is performing.  The 1.2% growth he used to promote good Governance and sound policies could only convince the naive.  Just imagine how much better those numbers would be if Tourism and the export revenues were still receiving the benefits of a much lower currency.

Dropping Interest Rates would discourage the offshore investors and bring some uncertainty lessen the predictability of the RBA’s targeted policy toward inflation.

Since 1990 when this formal arrangement was first developed – ‘INFLATION’ was a global problem.  It is not so now.  The GFC impact is creating massive disparity within developed economies.  The glaring cause of this is the pegged value of the Chinese Renminbi‎ – and no matter what pressure is bought to bear on the Chinese officials – they refuse to yield to any part of their advantage against other and more developed Nations.

This single issue has the potential to bring the whole ‘house of cards’ tumbling down.   History plays a big role here – has the West treated China with more respect and dignity in the past – perhaps they would not now be so unrepentant about their advantage as it stands.

Then again – China must decide if it wants to become a Global Leader in every sense of what that responsibility carries.  Post WWII – America stepped up and spent US$Trillions in modern day value to rebuild and be the Global police force – they did it willingly and with good intent.  Unless China begin to realise the importance they play in the global economy – trade embargos will be considered.

Can you imagine China having sanctions placed on its import of resources it desperately needs – it should not come to this – but with the amount of vacant space in global Leadership – wars have been fought with similar Leadership were holding the keys …

I suggest that the RBA and the Treasurer read their charter in more precise terms and reconsider the ‘INFLATION” priority and focus on what is good for the Australian economy – a stable A$ v US$ relationship that is more in line with the average value over the last 40 odd years.

[For reference purposes the Trade Weighted Index (TWI) – the basket value of currencies of Australia’s major trading partners – does not reflect the same volatility as the A$ v US$ chart avove – nevertheless – most export contracts are based in US$’s as the global reserve currency.]

Link to PART 1 in this series:



%d bloggers like this: