Home > Current Affairs, Politics - Domestic, Politics - International, The EYE-BALL MediaZone, The EYE-BALL Opinion > EYE-BALL Opinion on – Google Report on Political Censorship

EYE-BALL Opinion on – Google Report on Political Censorship

– Google Report on Political Censorship –
18th June 2012.
Google has released its latest numbers for internet content and search engine links that it has been asked to remove and/or censure.

When this story was first read it was taken as copyright type violations and the like and thought to be justified. When more research was undertaken the following information was found.  Click on the links in the story to find out more.

Google: Western Democracies Also Seek to Censor Political Content

| By John Ribeiro, IDG News  |  Jun 18, 2012 5:10 pm | Link to On-line story. |

Western democracies, which are not typically associated with censorship, have demanded that Google take down certain political videos, blog posts, and other content, the company said Sunday.

The company as on previous occasions has been asked to take down political speech in many countries, Google said.

“It’s alarming not only because free expression is at risk, but because some of these requests come from countries you might not suspect–Western democracies not typically associated with censorship,” said Dorothy Chou, Google’s senior policy analyst in a blog post.

Google received for example a request from Canada’s passport issuing office to remove a YouTube video of a Canadian citizen urinating on his passport and flushing it down the toilet. “We did not comply with this request,” Google said.

Spanish regulators asked Google in the second half of last year to remove 270 search results that linked to blogs and articles in newspapers that referred to individuals and public figures, including mayors and public prosecutors. “In Poland, we received a request from a public institution to remove links to a site that criticized it,” Chou said. Google said it didn’t comply with both requests.

U.S. government requests to remove content have for example increased by 103 percent in the second half of last year from the first half, Google said in its Transparency Report which it released Sunday.

In the U.S., one of the requests the Internet company received was from a local law enforcement agency to remove 1400 YouTube videos for alleged harassment, but it did not comply with the request. It also received a court order to remove 218 search results that linked to allegedly defamatory websites, and removed 25 percent of the results cited.

But Google also complied with some requests from governments such as one from Thailand to remove 149 YouTube videos that allegedly insulted the country’s monarchy, which is a crime in the country. “We restricted 70 percent of these videos from view in Thailand in accordance with local law,” it said. Following a request from a UK police association, Google terminated five YouTube user accounts that allegedly promoted terrorism on the grounds that they violated the website’s guidelines, and removed as a result about 640 videos.

Worldwide, Google said it had received over 467 court orders covering over 7000 items between July and December 2011. It also received 561 other requests, including from the police, covering about 5000 items in the second half.

Other countries that are known to have differences with Google over online content also continued to demand removal of such content. In India, for example, the number of content removal requests from the government increased by 49 percent compared to the previous reporting period.

Google along with some other Internet companies already faces lawsuits in India for content found objectionable on its websites. A key issue in the dispute is whether an intermediary can be held liable for third-party content on its websites.

The U.S. topped in requests for user data with 6321 requests of which 93 percent were fully or partially complied with, while India came second with over 2000 requests, of which 66 percent were complied with by Google. Some of the requests in the U.S. were on behalf of other governments.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John’s e-mail address is john_ribeiro@idg.com


This story is not mainstream – it bloody well should be.  Who is questioning the rights to have free speech censored?

Is the content Google’s responsibility – are they playing GOD … or are the courts involved?  The research continues.

You can find Australia statistis using this link.


Have your say where it counts: – contact your Local Federal Representative via the links below and let them know how you feel about this, or any other topic that you feel strongly about – or you can just post a comment below and let off some steam.

Link to Previous EYE-BALL Posts.


The EYE-BALL Opinion …

  1. Les Patterson
    June 18, 2012 at 9:15 pm

    Fuckin’ Pollie assholes – they would lick eachothers toad droppings trying to get a taste for the dirt … piss on them – no I wouldn’t even if they were on fire.

  1. June 18, 2012 at 9:43 pm
  2. June 19, 2012 at 2:51 am
  3. June 19, 2012 at 5:04 am
  4. June 19, 2012 at 5:11 am
Comments are closed.
%d bloggers like this: